<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Swamp Report &#187; Citigroup</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.swampreport.com/tag/citigroup/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.swampreport.com</link>
	<description>Political, Economic, and Finance related commentary. J.D. Swampfox Associates report on battles for prosperity against the &#34;Tarleton&#34; of big government.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 14:35:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Banks: separating sheep from goats</title>
		<link>http://www.swampreport.com/investments/banks-separating-sheep-from-goats/</link>
		<comments>http://www.swampreport.com/investments/banks-separating-sheep-from-goats/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 03:12:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>J. D. Swampfox</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Investments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank assets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citigroup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goldman Sachs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JP Morgan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[s4/7 Wall St.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sell rating on banks stocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wells FArgo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.swampreport.com/?p=1274</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Swamp Report would not be the first to say &#8220;takes one to know one&#8221;.  24/7 Wall St. reports that Friday, May 1,  JP Morgan issued a negative bank research call for the major money center and super-regional banks: &#8220;Bank of America Corporation (NYSE: BAC), Citigroup, Inc. (NYSE: C), U.S. Bancorp (NYSE: USB), Wells Fargo &#38; [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.swampreport.com/investments/banks-separating-sheep-from-goats/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Government regulators intentional leak: Citi needs $10B more capital</title>
		<link>http://www.swampreport.com/politics/government-regulators-intentional-leak-citi-needs-10b-more-capital/</link>
		<comments>http://www.swampreport.com/politics/government-regulators-intentional-leak-citi-needs-10b-more-capital/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 21:02:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>J. D. Swampfox</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Investments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank stress tests are a sham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citigroup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government leaks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stress tests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zero Hedge]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.swampreport.com/?p=1264</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[WSJ reports that &#8220;people familiar with the matter&#8221; are suggesting Citigroup may need to raise as much as $10 billion in new capital: &#8220;The bank, like many others, is negotiating with the Federal Reserve and may need less if regulators accept the bank&#8217;s arguments about its financial health, these people said.  In a best-case scenario, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.swampreport.com/politics/government-regulators-intentional-leak-citi-needs-10b-more-capital/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BofA &amp; Citi can&#8217;t increase capital by converting preferred</title>
		<link>http://www.swampreport.com/investments/bofa-citi-cant-increase-capital-by-converting-preferred/</link>
		<comments>http://www.swampreport.com/investments/bofa-citi-cant-increase-capital-by-converting-preferred/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 00:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>J. D. Swampfox</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Investments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank of America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citigroup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.swampreport.com/?p=1226</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mike Shedlock comments on the WSJ&#8217;s reporting that the Fed Pushes Citi, BofA to Increase Capital: The most likely ways for the banks to raise capital are via dilution of Treasury owned preferred stock at taxpayer expense and via the Public Private Investment Plan (PPIP). The latter is a scam to heist taxpayers to the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.swampreport.com/investments/bofa-citi-cant-increase-capital-by-converting-preferred/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama to banks: nothing personal, it&#8217;s just business, er politics</title>
		<link>http://www.swampreport.com/politics/obama-to-banks-nothing-personal-its-just-business-er-politics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.swampreport.com/politics/obama-to-banks-nothing-personal-its-just-business-er-politics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 14:40:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>J. D. Swampfox</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bureaucrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bailouts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[banking oligopoly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citigroup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Dizard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Republic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama and the banks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Geithner]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.swampreport.com/?p=832</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two opinions, taken together, can lead to a slightly different conclusion than if only one or the other is taken singularly.  Two separate opinions out this morning illustrate this. The first is in FT , where John Dizard opines that Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner will likely be relieved of duty soon: &#8220;For the rest of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.swampreport.com/politics/obama-to-banks-nothing-personal-its-just-business-er-politics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Banks raised expectations for 1st quarter earnings &#8211; now can they deliver?</title>
		<link>http://www.swampreport.com/economy/banks-raised-expectations-for-1st-quarter-earnings-now-can-they-deliver/</link>
		<comments>http://www.swampreport.com/economy/banks-raised-expectations-for-1st-quarter-earnings-now-can-they-deliver/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 03:17:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>J. D. Swampfox</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank earnings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank of America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank writeoffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citigroup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JP Morgan Chase]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.swampreport.com/?p=590</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We all recall the recent boasting by Citi, B of A and JP Morgan that earnings in Jan and Feb were positive and the subsequent backpedaling that occurred regarding March.  Euromoney is questioning whether the banks can deliver on these new raised expectations. They document that investment banking fee revenues have supplied some profits, but [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.swampreport.com/economy/banks-raised-expectations-for-1st-quarter-earnings-now-can-they-deliver/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

