<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Swamp Report &#187; private investors</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.swampreport.com/tag/private-investors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.swampreport.com</link>
	<description>Political, Economic, and Finance related commentary. J.D. Swampfox Associates report on battles for prosperity against the &#34;Tarleton&#34; of big government.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 14:35:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Famous last words from Sheila Bair: &#8220;Our accountants have signed off on no net losses”</title>
		<link>http://www.swampreport.com/economy/famous-last-words-from-sheila-bare-%e2%80%9cour-accountants-have-signed-off-on-no-net-losses%e2%80%9d/</link>
		<comments>http://www.swampreport.com/economy/famous-last-words-from-sheila-bare-%e2%80%9cour-accountants-have-signed-off-on-no-net-losses%e2%80%9d/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 15:06:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>J. D. Swampfox</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank assets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDIC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDIC borrowing limits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[private investors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public-private partnerships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sheila Bair]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.swampreport.com/?p=703</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Andrew Ross Sorkin in the NYT says (we added the emphasis): &#8220;&#8230;the F.D.I.C is trying to stabilize the system by adding more risk, not less, to the system. It’s going to be insuring 85 percent of the debt, provided by the Treasury, that private investors will use to subsidize their acquisitions of toxic assets. These [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.swampreport.com/economy/famous-last-words-from-sheila-bare-%e2%80%9cour-accountants-have-signed-off-on-no-net-losses%e2%80%9d/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blodget: Bank assets prices will have new values established, but unintended consequences</title>
		<link>http://www.swampreport.com/economy/blodget-bank-assets-prices-will-have-new-values-established-but-unintended-consequences/</link>
		<comments>http://www.swampreport.com/economy/blodget-bank-assets-prices-will-have-new-values-established-but-unintended-consequences/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 23:36:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>J. D. Swampfox</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bureaucrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank assets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geithner plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[private investors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.swampreport.com/?p=434</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Henry Blodget may be disgraced as an internet stock analyst but his argument makes sense.Â  We raised a similar idea.Â  The basic idea is that when one bank receives and accepts an offer on a particular asset, the argument that &#8220;there is no market price&#8221; can no longer be used by that bank or others. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.swampreport.com/economy/blodget-bank-assets-prices-will-have-new-values-established-but-unintended-consequences/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Distressed real estate in Europe hints why Geithner&#8217;s plan is hobbled</title>
		<link>http://www.swampreport.com/politics/distressed-real-estate-in-europe-hints-why-geithners-plan-is-hobbled/</link>
		<comments>http://www.swampreport.com/politics/distressed-real-estate-in-europe-hints-why-geithners-plan-is-hobbled/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 03:31:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>J. D. Swampfox</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank assets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commercial Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe financial crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[private investors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.swampreport.com/?p=405</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Phillip Moore&#8217;s article in Euromoney describes many investors and much money (from both UK and US investors) allocated to snapping up distressed commercial real estate debt.Â  What&#8217;s interesting to us is the indications in the article that it&#8217;s the banks that are unwilling to sell &#8211; that is preventing the investments &#8211; NOT a need [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.swampreport.com/politics/distressed-real-estate-in-europe-hints-why-geithners-plan-is-hobbled/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

