<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Swamp Report &#187; Zero Hedge</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.swampreport.com/tag/zero-hedge/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.swampreport.com</link>
	<description>Political, Economic, and Finance related commentary. J.D. Swampfox Associates report on battles for prosperity against the &#34;Tarleton&#34; of big government.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 14:35:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>PMI not leaked- it&#8217;s perfectly legal, but shouldn&#8217;t be</title>
		<link>http://www.swampreport.com/investments/pmi-not-leaked-its-perfectly-legal-but-shouldnt-be/</link>
		<comments>http://www.swampreport.com/investments/pmi-not-leaked-its-perfectly-legal-but-shouldnt-be/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 00:50:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>J. D. Swampfox</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Investments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advance looks at data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bespoke Investments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago PMI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flash trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subscribers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zero Hedge]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.swampreport.com/?p=2535</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Zero Hedge ran a post today about the fact that subscribers can pay for a 3 minute advance look at the Chicago PMI before it is released to the &#8220;general public&#8221;. The Chicago PMI &#8220;indicates how vibrant regional manufacturing activity is. An index value of 50 or higher indicates increasing busi-ness activity; below that indicates [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.swampreport.com/investments/pmi-not-leaked-its-perfectly-legal-but-shouldnt-be/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dennis &#8220;The Recession is Over&#8221; Kneale</title>
		<link>http://www.swampreport.com/economy/dennis-the-recession-is-over-kneale/</link>
		<comments>http://www.swampreport.com/economy/dennis-the-recession-is-over-kneale/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 13:41:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>J. D. Swampfox</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dennis Kneale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karl Denninger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zero Hedge]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.swampreport.com/?p=1771</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CNBC&#8217;s Dennis Kneale declared the recession to be over&#8230; then lambasted &#8220;cowardly anonymous bloggers&#8221; for jeering his declaration: Karl Denninger, a not-so-anonymous blogger, calls Dennis an idiot, then: OK, now on to the facts &#8211; your idiotic and utterly unsupportable &#8220;the recession is over&#8221; call. There are two types of recessions, if you happen to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.swampreport.com/economy/dennis-the-recession-is-over-kneale/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Zero Hedge: The Bureau of Lies and Statistics</title>
		<link>http://www.swampreport.com/economy/zero-hedge-the-bureau-of-lies-and-statistics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.swampreport.com/economy/zero-hedge-the-bureau-of-lies-and-statistics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 15:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>J. D. Swampfox</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BLS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Econompics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seasonal revisions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zero Hedge]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.swampreport.com/?p=1339</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Zero Hedge is skeptical of the BLS unemployment release, highlighting the seasonal adjustments made and the temporary hiring of census workers: &#8220;I will bet one double Quarter Pounder with cheese and bacon that next month, the revisions of the April numbers will be on the order of an additional 85,000 unemployed. My guess is that, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.swampreport.com/economy/zero-hedge-the-bureau-of-lies-and-statistics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Government regulators intentional leak: Citi needs $10B more capital</title>
		<link>http://www.swampreport.com/politics/government-regulators-intentional-leak-citi-needs-10b-more-capital/</link>
		<comments>http://www.swampreport.com/politics/government-regulators-intentional-leak-citi-needs-10b-more-capital/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 21:02:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>J. D. Swampfox</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Investments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank stress tests are a sham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citigroup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government leaks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stress tests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zero Hedge]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.swampreport.com/?p=1264</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[WSJ reports that &#8220;people familiar with the matter&#8221; are suggesting Citigroup may need to raise as much as $10 billion in new capital: &#8220;The bank, like many others, is negotiating with the Federal Reserve and may need less if regulators accept the bank&#8217;s arguments about its financial health, these people said.  In a best-case scenario, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.swampreport.com/politics/government-regulators-intentional-leak-citi-needs-10b-more-capital/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Unemployment claims&#8230;-53M last week, whither this week?</title>
		<link>http://www.swampreport.com/economy/unemployment-claims-53m-last-week-whither-this-week/</link>
		<comments>http://www.swampreport.com/economy/unemployment-claims-53m-last-week-whither-this-week/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 02:42:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>J. D. Swampfox</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[department of labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Easter week unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Structural Logic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zero Hedge]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.swampreport.com/?p=1030</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week DOL reported the advance figure for seasonally adjusted initial claims was 610,000, a decrease of 53,000 from the previous week&#8217;s revised figure of 663,000. Yesterday, Zero Hedge posted a report by Structural Logic which anticipates another decline: Last week, Swamp Report posted our own analysis of Easter week unemployment claims and found that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.swampreport.com/economy/unemployment-claims-53m-last-week-whither-this-week/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It&#8217;s Passover &#8211; maybe most bears are jewish</title>
		<link>http://www.swampreport.com/investments/its-passover-maybe-most-bears-are-jewish/</link>
		<comments>http://www.swampreport.com/investments/its-passover-maybe-most-bears-are-jewish/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 16:43:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>J. D. Swampfox</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Investments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Easter eggs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Passover low volume]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S&P 500]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standard and Poor's 500 stock average]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stock prices with little volume]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[volume weighted price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zero Hedge]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.swampreport.com/?p=752</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Zero Hedge has a great post out on the recent low volume movements in the S&#38;P.  It occured to us that maybe all the bears are celebrating Passover, while what few bulls remain are hiding Easter eggs, (or is that goose eggs? ) that will be found later, after they ferment a while.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.swampreport.com/investments/its-passover-maybe-most-bears-are-jewish/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Moody&#8217;s: &#8220;Commercial RE has worst decline ever&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.swampreport.com/economy/zero-hedge-moodys-says-commercial-re-has-worst-decline-ever/</link>
		<comments>http://www.swampreport.com/economy/zero-hedge-moodys-says-commercial-re-has-worst-decline-ever/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 21:40:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>J. D. Swampfox</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[banks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commercial Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zero Hedge]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.swampreport.com/?p=230</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hat tip to Zero Hedge. New York, March 19, 2009 â€” Commercial real estate prices as measured by Moodyâ€™s/REAL Commercial Property Price Indices (CPPI) decreased in January by 5.5% from the previous month. The January decline was the largest in the history of the index, which has followed commercial real estate prices since December 2000. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.swampreport.com/economy/zero-hedge-moodys-says-commercial-re-has-worst-decline-ever/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

